Tsvangirai lied under oath, could face criminal charges

This article was written by on 16 September, at 01 : 06 AM

Print

Prime Minister Mr Morgan Tsvangirai may face criminal charges for deliberately lying under oath about his mar­riage to Ms Locardia Karimatsenga when he desperately sought a marriage licence to wed his lover Ms Elizabeth Macheka.

Under Zimbabwean law, perjury, which is defined as knowingly lying under oath, is a criminal offence punish­able with up to five years’ imprisonment.

Mr Tsvangirai misrepresented in affidavits filed both at the High Court and magistrates’ court that he had only paid damages for Ms Karimatsenga and not married her, a claim disproved by Harare provincial magis­trate Mr Munamato Mutevedzi last week.

Mr Mutevedzi, in cancelling a marriage licence he had granted earlier to the premier and Ms Macheka, said after reviewing the evidence brought to court by Ms Kari­matsinga’s lawyers, he was convinced that Mr Tsvangirai had paid lobola to the Karimatsinga family on November 11 last year.

The evidence included video footage of the lobola pro­ceedings in which the MDC-T co-Home Affairs Min­ister Mrs Theresa Makone, who was part of the negotiat­ing team, was heard shouting that “Tapiwa muchato” mean­ing “we have been given permission for a white wed­ding”.


However, when Mr Tsvangirai sought the marriage licence with Ms Macheka, the magistrate asked them if they knew of any lawful impediment why they could not be joined in matrimony, to which they both said no.

The magistrate also specifically asked if he had married Ms Karimatsinga as was reported in the media, and again the premier denied that fact. His actions, therefore, could have amounted to perjury.

Legal experts yesterday said the Prime Minister had also committed fraud because his misrepresentation of fact had both actual and potential prejudice to Ms Kari­matsenga.

Actual prejudice, they said, arose from the fact that Ms Karimatsenga had to institute legal action to stop his pending marriage to Ms Macheka while potentially, if Mr Tsvangirai’s marriage had been allowed to go ahead, then his wife would have been automatically divorced.

This means that her maintenance suit against him would have fallen away.

Ms Karimatsenga’s lawyer, Mr Jonathan Samukange of Venturas and Samukange, said if Mr Tsvangirai’s marriage had gone on, his client would have lost financial support, conjugal rights and companionship, among other losses.

Former Attorney-General Mr Sobusa Gula-Ndebele also told The Sunday Mail yesterday that Mr Tsvangirai could be charged with perjury on the basis of his sworn affidavit to the court denying his marriage to Ms Karimat­senga.

“If the court found for a fact that he (Mr Tsvangirai) married the woman (Ms Karimatsenga) and yet he had said he did not marry her in a sworn affidavit, then clearly he lied under oath. That is a serious criminal offence, especially if it involves such a senior Govern­ment official as the Prime Minister” said Mr Gula-Ndebele.

Another legal expert, Mr Pisirayi Kwenda of Kwenda and Associates, also concurred that the Prime Minister could have perjured himself through his affi­davit.

“Just going by the ruling of the mag­istrate, he (Mr Tsvangirai) might have perjured himself,” he said.
According to the legal experts, hav­ing taken an oath to uphold the laws of this country as the Prime Minis­ter, Mr Tsvangirai appears to have deliberately flouted the same laws he promised to obey and uphold.

The Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act Chapter XI Section 183 on the crimes against the administra­tion of justice, describes perjury as:

“(1) Any person who, in the course of or for the purpose of judicial pro­ceedings, makes a false state­ment upon oath, whether the statement is written or oral
(a) knowing that the statement is false or
(b) realising that there is a real risk or possibility that it may be false, shall be guilty of perjury and liable to a fine not exceeding level ten or imprisonment for a period not exceeding five years or both.

Last week Mr Samukange wrote to the Attorney-General’s Office urging the Government’s law division to act on the criminal offences against the Prime Min­ister.

Although no official comment could be obtained from the AG’s Office, an official from that office con­firmed receipt of the letter from Mr Samukange, which he said was still being scrutinised.

The Sunday Mail

Incoming search terms:

  • munamato mutevedzi
  • affidavit under zimbabwean law
  • Gula Ndebele divorces his wife
  • munamato mutevedzi photos
  • Sobusa Gula Ndebele marries

National , , , ,

Related Posts

3 Comments


  1. MrK, 7 months ago Reply

    HAWKMANN,

    ” anyway, this white wedding dress ceremony – where does this white colonial habit we have embraced stem from ? ”

    The history is that upto the 15th or 16th Century in Europe, white was the color of the soul, and therefore symbolized death.

    Mourners used to be dressed in white, probably to consfuse evil spirits as to who had died. Sometime later the color of death became black, hence today’s funeral attire.

    However, in weddings white was maintained as the color of death, symbolizing the death of the girl and the birth of the woman. (They also used to splash chicken blood on the dress, as ‘evidence’ that the girl married as a virgin. Gypsies still do or at least did well into the 1960s.)

    Anyway, leave it to rhodies to make it about ‘race’, which according to the Genographic Project doesn’t even exist, and is a 19th century taxonomic definition that says nothing about genes.

    For instance, did you know that Adolf Hitler’s haplogroup was E1b1b, which is very rare in Europe and in his native Austria occurs nearly exclusively among Jews, because the Jews came fled out of the Nile Valley. The haplogroup associated with the Bantu Migrations is E1b1a. Both E1b1a and E1b1b originate in East Africa, between 30,000 to 20,000 years ago. In other words, Hitler’s haplogroup is closer to nearly all Black Africans, than it is to any white Europeans. Race does not exist.

    Wrap your head around that. :) And check out the Genographic Project.


  2. HAWKMANN, 8 months ago Reply

    anyway, this white wedding dress ceremony – where does this white colonial habit we have embraced stem from ?

    methinks its a white colonial ritual that conditions the woman to taking her place in the kitchen slaving behind the white stove, kneeling in front of the white washing machine to keep our shirts clean, and ensuring that our beers are cold in the white fridge at all times…its not a bad idea after all is it?


  3. HAWKMANN, 8 months ago Reply

    this is such bad news for the rest of us – no excuses now for not marrying our mistresses!


Post Your Comments

SOCIAL NETWORKING

Photo Gallery